Friday, August 04, 2006

The rise of the electric car?

Cars have transformed history, lives and cities in the past century. Cars have allowed people to travel further, more easily, comfortably and cheaply than previous modes of transport. They have also transformed landscapes, with substantial amounts of land devoted to roads and cities that are larger and more spread-out. Cars inspire passion. The fact that they are inherently individualistic - you travel in them alone or with your family and you can buy one that expresses your tastes and tells people who you think you are – I think does a lot to polarise opinions about them. They are often portrayed as being symbolic of freedom – go where you want to go, but to detractors they can represent a selfish individualism where people enter little metal boxes and disengage with their communities.

The connections between cars and other modes of transport, urban planning, economics, productivity and the environment are strong and complicated. Posts about urban transport policy invariably elicit strong debates on this blog. But some environmental impacts of cars are relatively straightforward, In particular, they are large contributors to urban air and noise pollution and global greenhouse gas emissions.

Electric cars promise to reduce some of these environmental impacts. They can be quieter, more efficient and less polluting. And with high petroleum prices, they have been attracting attention lately.

Pure electric cars run on a rechargeable battery than can be recharged just by plugging them into a power point in your garage. (note we’re not talking here about hybrids – they run on petrol but have a battery that’s recharged from the engine and from braking and they can be thought of just as a much more efficient petrol vehicle). From a consumer point of view, electric powered cars have two main advantages: they’re pretty cheap and they have a much lower running cost (about 1 – 2 cents per kilometre, less than 20% of the cost of petrol vehicles). But they have had two major limitations: low range between recharges and low speed. They’ve been kind of souped-up golf carts.

But new models can go further and longer between recharges and can achieve much higher speeds. USA Today earlier this week looked at two models on the US market: a US$100,000 electric "high-performance" sports car and a US$9,000 "city car".

The sports car version has a range of over 400km (which would allow an easy Canberra – Sydney drive with some detours and a margin of error) and a top speed of over 200km an hour which is a great deal more than anyone should be thinking about doing anyway. The city car has a range of just over 60km and a top speed of just over 60km/hr. Other models to hit the market soon start at US$5,000 for a 40km/h 2-seater with a 50 km range. The technology is advancing rapidly, with speed and range increasing.

What about the environmental impacts?

The biggest environmental benefits compared to regular petrol cars is in local noise and air pollution. These cars are much quieter and cause no particulate pollution in the city because they run on electricity. Of course, there’s air pollution created in generating the electricity that they run on (particularly in Australia where it’s likely to be generated by coal) but there’s still a substantial net benefit in terms of health etc because Australia’s power plants tend to be located in sparsely populated areas and where the particulates disperse before damaging people’s health (as opposed to cities where people breathe within metres of a car’s exhaust).

In terms of greenhouse emissions, electricity’s no better than petrol (unless it’s from low-emission sources such as wind or solar) so electric cars are only beneficial if they’re much more efficient (or if consumers choose to power them from ‘green’ electricity – which I guess is a real possibility for the segment of the market who’d be interested in these vehicles).

So are they much more efficient?

Well yes they are – much more. The typical electric vehicle today uses 0.3 to 0.5 kilowatt-hours per mile (0.2–0.3 kWh/km) while the average car in the US is equivalent to 1.58 kilowatt-hours per mile.

But will people buy these cars? And if so, who?

Well it doesn’t take a marketing genius to figure out people aren’t going to sell their Commodores and buy a zippy electric car that can do 60km at 60kph before the battery dies. But they’re cheap and getting cheaper and really cheap to run. So I can imagine a family getting one as their second car to drive the kids to school and soccer, go to the supermarket, maybe drive to work. The sportscars are going to have a limited market, but they’re pretty cool. They accelerate and handle better than a petrol car and there’s got to be some status in having an electric car, particularly if you sign up to green power with your power company. Very green chic, very sci fi - or something. If only DeLorean made one. That would be cool.

technorati:

15 comments:

Rob Dawg said...

Oh dear. Where to begin? Okay, first you are comparing brand new, cutting edge, designed for efficiency, small, niche vehicles to the 8.8 year old average US automobile (23mpg) in your efficiency comparison. Second, you fall for the lie of omission in comparing electricity to chemical fuels. Only 31% of the energy used to make grid electricity actually gets to the customer. When that electricity is used to charge a battery. Can be 60% but never less than 20% losses. So, getting useful work out of an EV is about 25% efficient. 0.3-0.5 kW-h/mile is 1000-1700 BTU/mile. 1.58 kW-h/mile is 5,400 BTU/mile or 23 mpg as calculated but the equivalency ignores passenger loads. While there is no definitive information it is highly likely that EV useage resembles the average occupancy of the commute segment of road users; 1.2 passengers while the US average is 1.57 passengers.

You see where I'm going with this, EVs are not anywhere near as efficient (yet) as their proponents claim. Within the next few years as solar comes down in price and/or increases in efficiency and as technology improves maybe but not yet. Oh, and it is important to note that a huge portion of the claimed transportation efficiency derived from EV designs can be applied to IC primary movers; low cD, narrow tires, limited capacity, range, advanced materials energy recovery, etc.

In short, every bit of advancement helps but there's no magic bullet here.

Robert Metcalfe said...

I looking forward to the day of solar paneled cars! Until then, I'm not too sure about EVs, there needs to be supplies of electric everywhere which would be quite costly for the govt (or private company) to run. Also I have my doubts about their actual efficiency, but if oil prices keep on rising, you never know, Ford, GM etc might invest heavily in this form of transport.

Rob Dawg said...

I did the math for the nation-state of California on my blog:

http://exurbannation.blogspot.com/2006/08/lets-go-ev.html

Long story short; to replace gasoline autos with EVs would require tripling electrical power generating capacity.

Anonymous said...

"Oh Dear? Where do I begin?" Robert, you are rude and patronising.

The lie of omission? What the hell is that? Actually, don't bother answering.

Rob Dawg said...

The "oh dear" comment was one of so much information with so much subtlety that a blog reply would surely prove inadequate. I apologize to anyone who thought it directed at any individual rather than the daunting task as was intended.

The lie of omission persists. Our host did not commit it but as I noted merely uncritically repeated it. Using 0.3-0.5 kWH/mile is not the proper comparison due to losses at every point in the total energy cycle. EVs are not bad at all and there is much promise, more IMO than in traditional IC motive power technologies. If I were induced to pick my magic bullets they would be; room temperature superconduction, catalytic dissassociation of water, amorphous solar efficiency breakthroughs, low temperature/pressure fusion.

In closing anyone interested in continuing is welcome to my blog, I take requests. And anyone interested in a true example of rude and patronizing need look no further than above with the dismissive; "Actually, don't bother answering." My modus operandi is to interpret such as an admission that the poster cannot refute the answer, knows the answer is correct and refuses to accept the answer.

David Jeffery said...

What answer Bob?

Anonymous said...

bad car credit loan refinancing
bad credit auto refinancing
bad credit car refinancing
bad credit home refinancing
bad credit mortgage refinancing
bad credit refinancing
bad credit refinancing home loan
credit mortgage poor refinancing
poor credit refinancing
refinancing home with poor credit
bad credit mortgage refinancing

depression said...

http://www.depression-care.org/
Anxiety Depression,idea of co-occurring anxiety
Help Depression,all solution on msn

Anonymous said...

Today's batteries have an efficiency of 90%, not 20%-60%. Even, Lead acid batteries are 75- 80 percent efficient.
Internal combustion engines have peaked in efficiency, around 20% with a turbocharger.

With the current power plant infrastructure, electric vehicle's to the ground efficiency is around 25%. But that has nothing to do with the car, though; it has to do with the old power plants. Modern power plants have efficiency of 50-60 percent, compared to national average of 33%, which changes everything.

Electric cars are mostly charged at night, so your assumption that we would have to triple the amount of power plants is misguided. Plus, increasing modern power plants would be a net gain for society, especially if they build more nuclear, wind and hydro power plants. Capacity right now can support millions of cars.

Cars for sale ads said...

This blog have been helped me a lot to realize more things regarding the tax related issues which is very much interesting.

Daihatsu Terios 4WD said...

Your work is very good and I appreciate you and hopping for some more informative posts. Thank you for sharing great information to us.

alice copper said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
alice copper said...



Electric cars guarantee to decrease some of these environmental effects. They can be quieter, more efficient and less polluting.
Lone Mountain Truck Leasing

Dwayne Charles said...

The scope of the electric cars has spread with a great speed in the modern century. I think that they will surely be seen on the roads before the end of the year.
national auto transport quotes , auto transport quotes , free auto transport quotes

sbtitcc said...

Honda Fit