Tuesday, February 28, 2006

What to do with toxic consumer products?


Something I’ve been concerned about for a while is the nasty toxic chemicals in lots of ordinary household electrical products that wind up in landfill. Pretty much anything with a rechargeable battery has these nasties and apparently 70% of the toxic heavy metals in landfill comes from electronic products.

There is very little being done about this problem in Australia as far as I’m aware, with responses limited to a few voluntary industry schemes. The mobile phone industry has a scheme where anyone can take old mobile phone batteries to any mobile phone retailer for recycling and apparently Sony recycles any household batteries if you take them in to their stores or offices).

Europe has always been the leader in this area with requirements that manufacturers take responsibility for dealing with the products they’ve produced when they’ve reached the end of their useful lives.

Now it seems California may leapfrog ahead of the game:


California would require manufacturers to phase out the use of hazardous materials in making cell phones, iPods and other electronic devices under a bill introduced by a state lawmaker.

The bill unveiled Thursday by Assembly Member Lori Saldana, a Democrat from San Diego, would apply to any electronic or battery-operated device. The bill, which was introduced Wednesday, would require manufacturers to stop using the substances in devices sold in California by 2008.

"We know that the manufacturers of these products are able to produce them without including harmful toxic materials," Saldana said in a written statement. "California deserves to be included among the markets that receive this cleaner stream of consumer electronics."

California already requires manufacturers of video displays in devices to phase out the use of toxic materials.
What’s the best way to deal with this issue? The European option has always seemed very sensible to me: make manufacturers responsible for taking back and dealing with what they produce. That way they can choose how best to deal with heavy metals – either not use these materials in the first place or use them and then re-use or recycle them at the end.

However, if consumers will inevitably dispose of these in household garbage anyway and if, as Saldana claims, manufacturers can make these products without harmful materials (at little extra cost?), then it makes more sense to simply ban these materials altogether.

It will be interesting to see if these laws pass and – if so – whether the so-called ‘California effect’ means that other countries get non-toxic iPods too. California is sufficiently wealthy and populous that consumer product companies cannot afford to ignore the market entirely so its regulations affect regulations elsewhere. So, if Apple wants to sell its iPods in California, it must decide whether to make two products – one for sale in California and one for the rest of the world – or to make all iPods comply with the new California law.

6 comments:

signature103 said...

Excuse my ignorance. I am new to environmentalism.

So which is better for the environment: disposable or rechargeable batteries?

Amy Stodghill said...

I'd like to think that the 'california effect' can make a difference (it has done it in the past, with the auto industry for example) - although we might need to put up with a little industry flack first (ditto on the auto industry example) - but if companies such as apple, can come on board and take the toxics out the IPOD, it'll make it easier for others to follow suit.
Will it make it okay then for landfill disposal of these units? Not necessarily, but maybe it'll get the electronics industry thinking about whether or not it's cheaper for them to take out the toxics or take back their product.

David Jeffery said...

Yes I haven't addressed the broader issue of landfill generally. I don't know much about the technical side of this issue but I'd say rechargeable batteries are only better if they're made without toxic materials or if those materials are recycled when the product is disposed of. If the toxics end up in your local tip, disposable batteries are actually probably less harmful.

Andreya said...

Hi Nice Blog .Setting the backlight to “always on” will significantly reduce your ipod batteries life. Only use the backlight when necessary.

Compaq Laptop Battery said...

The environment as we know of it today is not the purest thing. Especially, with motor car companies being in mass productions for the past oh my sooo many years and so many more years to come. The environment of the world as we know it hasn't really been performing at it's peak recently. And do we know why? Well of course, I mean we should know why, we basically are the ones to blame. Not specifying anyone in particular but I'm pretty sure us humans have contributed to the most part. But, as much damage as we've done, shouldn't we begin to think on how we can either reverse the effect or at the least minimize the pollution??

Toyota Belta 2009 said...

This is such a great resource that you are providing and you give it away for free. I love seeing websites that understand the value of providing a quality information.